I just figured that I'd bring it up because that's a point that would definitely be used against me. I know that I'm not entirely innocent, as I was the one that provided the friend that made the video with the Duck Hunt source, but that's something that I don't want to get into in this document. Heck, you can even see this exact same email in the README of the Toontown Magic Word Manager repository, of which Benjamin contibuted to. As evident by the email shown on the first screenshot, this takedown was filed by Benjamin, who went under the name "BelloqZafarian" in Wizard101 circles. One was from a video that my friend made about the leak, and the other was from another friend that reuploaded the previous video. Below are some screenshots of two separate copyright takedowns that two videos that covered a Duck Hunt leak got. In fact, it makes Toontown Offline look worse because they did the exact same thing two years prior. Regarding the placement of the cease and desist among the materials posted regarding Corporate Clash going after Toontown Offline, it's very out of place. Was your defense in court going to be that Toontown Offline was an illegal project using copyrighted assets? If so, how would that defend you from the legal claims made against you? You could probably get away with defending yourself from copyright issues, but as far as I know, that's pretty much it. I would like to remind you, Drew, that you were threatened with a civil lawsuit if you didn't comply with the cease and desist. If Disney actually had a problem, it would've already been sorted out by now.īesides, the legal issues with Corporate Clash NPO are an entirely separate issue compared to the violation of the NDA. For goodness sake, I even talked about Corporate Clash NPO in my Corporate Clash review video from 2 years ago, so this issue is old news. For one thing, Disney obviously doesn't care about Corporate Clash being a non-profit organization. I don't see why it should be laughed at for the legality of the project. Now regarding the cease and desist that was posted onto the website. UPDATE: It was recently brought to my attention that Benjamin actually DID change the page to direct visitors to .uk. If there was anyone who could've done it, it was Benjamin. Toontown Offline × Corporate Clash Team Trees collaboration) Benjamin's recent involvement with this whole situation, which will be addressed when the day associated with it is published (). My guess is based on the following: Benjamin was a close friend of Nat (head of /r/toontown) before this all happened Benjamin was likely given some sort of access to the domain name since he was a contributor in trying to unite the Toontown community (ex. If I had to guess who was responsible for changing where redirected to, it was probably Benjamin, aka Rocky Reborn. Now that I'm done with my rambling, let's speculate. Why did this have to happen? Why did you steal a domain just to pedal Corporate Clash leaks? What did you have to gain? Was .uk, an OFFICIAL TOONTOWN WEBSITE DOMAIN, really not enough and you had to steal another website? Sorry about the tangent, but this is just ridiculous. My Opinionįirst of all, here's a bit of a rant. At the end of the TwitLonger, Mickey talks about how Toontown Offline was trying to improve its community and shared some discussion from the staff chats. He's especially adament about how Clash only suddenly pushed this to Joey because of what happened recently and is the sole reason why Toontown Offline was banned from the Toontown subreddit. The reason that it was posted was explained with the caption "Imagine sending a Cease and Desist to someone when the whole premise of your project is illegal to begin with".Īdditionally, King Mickey puts out his last big public TwitLonger on the situation by denouncing what Corporate Clash did by "cherrypicking" screenshots of questionable and explicit things that have happened in the Toontown Offline mini-server and Discord server and sending them to Joey, who has no idea how Toontown Offline works. Allegedly, more Clash raids occurred, including in-game as well.Īt some point during the day, .uk was updated again, but this time to add an image of a cease and desist that an individual named "Drew" (likely Drewcification) received from Corporate Clash in December 10th, 2018, for violating their NDA by leaking source code. Nat, who owned the website, changed it back and publicly shamed the people responsible on Twitter. The website, owned by no one in the .uk operation, was sabotaged and changed to redirect to .uk. Things continue right from the other night. Everything before this has just been posting information and preemptive action, but now marks the point where actual attacks are made. This is when the fangs from the people running .uk start to really show.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |